Friday, April 14, 2017

一個男仔學跳舞要闖的難關(香港版)

前幾晚去跳搖擺舞(swing dance)時,講起點解好似留唔到啲帶舞(lead)既男仔繼續去跳。結果,有好多有經驗既女仔,都要做帶舞者。本來在香港,當有人說起社交舞,就只要想起waltz, foxtrot, cha cha, rumba等的ballroom dance,較少人會聽過一些沒有那麼隆重的swing,所以已經少人玩了。現在還有女多男少的情況,令我覺得我花時間挽留一個男仔在swing比挽留一個女仔更重要。

其實,對於初學者來說,男仔有幾件事比女的要克服更多的困難。第一點應該全世界適用,但第二點可能是東亞文化的問題。

1. 男性初學者之苦(beginner's hell)

由於swing不是一個叫人背動作,而是靠兩人之間的力學而做出動作的舞,兩人在動作上的溝通非常重要。通常男仔會先學lead﹐而女仔會先學follow,但學過的話,男女其實都可以lead和follow。不過,由於通常男仔先學lead,所以以下的用字,男仔=lead。

第一堂通常大家都是先學基本步,又學下如何左右轉。但是,要成功lead到人,男的不但要知道手怎樣做,身體怎樣移動亦非常重要。很多時初學的男仔以為上堂學完怎樣轉女仔,就以為可以在舞會lead到所有人,結果發覺有個女仔不知道做甚麼。可能是那個女仔不懂,但亦可能是男仔的lead不夠清晰。不過,要清晰,就要練習。但當次次都lead不到,這個男仔可能會感到氣餒,又會想會不會那個女仔覺得他不會跳舞,感到羞愧。久而久之,男仔挫敗感上漲,就有機會離開不跳了。反而,初學的女仔只要對基本步和轉向有一定的認識,初級的步法應該是跟到的。

所以,就有如下圖,描述男女學習階段︰

I would prefer replacing the word "males" to "leads", and "females" to "follows".
女的可以很快就變做中級組,但男的很久才升上中級組。男仔未升上的時期,就是初學者之苦(beginner's hell)。所以,如果女仔對同班的男仔有過高的要求,男的可能憋不住,覺得swing不好玩而走了。

要男仔留待繼續跳,除了要這個男仔不怕失敗,鼓勵他們繼續嘗試與女仔跳,女的都要嘗試體諒男仔有較多東西要學,在覺得安全和自己需要照顧到的情況下,盡量和初學的男仔跳。

 2. 男仔對跳舞的偏見

關於香港人有沒有對跳舞存在偏見,我都還未搞清楚。以前在美國的多個舞場跳過不少次swing,都覺得男仔跳swing沒有甚麼禁忌,都是大家social一下罷了。在南美更不用說,男女跳舞只是生活的一部分。但在香港,不知有沒有人覺得男女授受不親,不想和一個普通女仔朋友有身體上的接觸呢?(其實,當我初學跳舞的時候,我都覺得經常轉partner好像有一些不妥。現在感覺少了,但不是沒有)

另外,不知有沒有香港人覺得跳舞是女仔的事,男仔跳舞會不夠man呢?

不如試試這麼想︰ 跳swing是一場比武較量。每一場舞,都試試評估對方的實力。如果別人比你強,可以試下可不可以在這場舞上找到一些學習靈感。如果你比人強,可以試下可不可以在這場舞中令到對方學到一些東西。不論是強是弱,跳完最少要心中感謝對方教到自己一些東西(撇除一些令你安全受到威脅的情況)。較量,不是要炫耀自己勁,只是要與雙方切磋。

跳兩人舞,其實不一定有浪漫成分,可以很好玩的。

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

QCOC 20th Anniversary Orienteering Championship - Ngau Liu --> Shek Lung Kung (2017-4-2)

Pre-race


Last Sunday, I went to Tai Mo Shan for another orienteering race. Perhaps many people going there for hiking, the only bus that got there skipped the bus stop because of the full bus. Eventually, five people going there shared a taxi.

The race had three different start locations that were remote from each other. People doing the beginner courses did not require a bus to get to. People in the intermediate courses needed to use the bus to get to halfway from the top. People in the advanced courses (I was in one of them) used the bus to get to the top. There were some complaints on participants that were parent-kid groups, where they needed to use different transportation to get to the start.

For the intermediate and advanced course participants, baggage were collected at the start, and could be claimed at the finish.

At the start, I sold the awarded GPS watch to an elite orienteer. I was thinking of using the money to buy another gadget that can be used in orienteering -- action camera (e.g. GoPro). With it, I will have more videos and still frames to show the competition progress.

Race analysis

The following is the MO (Men Open) map, applicable for M21 participants. My GPS route is also shown on this map.


I felt I did pretty well in the first 9 checkpoints (controls). The first few points were stream-following. Then, there were several short legs. At #9, I only used 30:36. When getting to #5, I passed through a truly "refreshment station". Usually, a "refreshment station" means just "water station". This time, however, there were Gatorade and Coke besides water. I did need a cup of water and a cup of Gatorade to refresh myself, since I did not think I drank enough water in the morning.

I think I made a routine choice mistake to #10. I used the red line route, thinking that going back to the open land (blue line route) may not earn me too much time. However, I think I am wrong. Nevertheless, I don't think this would cause too much time loss. (Let's make a guess. 1 minute?)


Since then, I made more and more mistakes along the way. When going to #11, I somehow thought that the trail to the south was on top of the hill, so I went back up. However, it was not. Thus, I was at the top of a hill, fighting unnecessarily with the thicket. This was likely a 2-3 min mistake.

Then, to #12, I could not resist my urge to do cross-country, like how I did more in the US. I considered the safe trail route (blue line, right map below), but I was also curious if the course setter was aware of the route that I chose, and checked this route properly. The route that I used may not be too slow, since there was no need to go back uphill, and the route was direct. By comparing the unmarked map on the left and the marked map on the right below, I think I followed the intended route. My thought: the last 1/3 of that open land strip was fine, but the beginning 2/3 took me a lot of time to pass through.


On the second stretch to #12, I tripped and felt a leg cramping. I then walked most of the time. After all, the trail was not very clear. I followed the stream instead. I guessed I made 7-8 min mistakes in this leg.

The trail that led to #13 was quite unclear. I thought as long as I observed the surrounding (first, a trail bend that I could see a big rock, and then passing through a marsh), I would find the point on the trail. However, I stepped in the marsh and could not find the trail. I saw several stone walls around, but the map did not indicate those. Fortunately, I saw a person walking fast, so I followed him to find the trail. That was 1-2 min mistake.

I got to another refreshment station with the similar choices of drinks. This station was situated at an abandoned school. See the Google Maps picture below. There was a stone slide!



When leaving #14, when I followed a trail and ran, I felt that something was wrong, since the compass pointed to a different direction. I stopped for a few seconds to diagnose that I went to a wrong trail, so I went back. I learned that one less-experienced orienteer went through the purple line (in the map below) all the way, before he found something was wrong. I told him that he should be able to identify the mistake faster.
 

I did not do well in leg #15. First, at A, I tried to fight through the dark green unsuccessfully. I should have run around the wood (to the south) and attack back to the north. Then, at B, I forgot that the checkpoint was right next to the dark green wood, and went up too far for another large rock. The location of the actual checkpoint was quite well-hidden, if not knowing what to look for. I guess it was a 4-5 min mistake.

For #17, I recognized the blue route possibility, but I did not want to risk not finding the route in the end, so I took a larger red route. I wondered how many minutes were lost in taking the red route. I also noticed that by using the red route, there were many checkpoints along the way, presumably for the beginner courses. A good number of beginners were walking against my running direction. I hope that the course setter now realized that this possible route choice caused the beginner and advanced sharing the same route, which is not a good practice.


It was #19 and #20 that killed me. To #19, I wondered if anybody was scared of the wood, and took the light blue route. These people will certainly be faster than me. I was totally at fault for #19. I thought about going west a bit, and when I saw a trail going south, I took that route. I did not see that, but I saw the open area (circle A on the left below). That was still not too bad. I could just find a way to go south.

I did not go south. I went into the thick wood. I decided to keep fighting the wood until I hit the trial downhill. It was a long time before I found a trace of trail, so I kept going east, hoping that I could eventually see some buildings on the left. It was not only a long way, but at some point, I could not find the trail, and was stuck among large boulders. It took me a while to find that I did not go far enough to the east. Once I saw the buildings, I was finally relieved, but I could only use walking speed now. I bet this was a 19-20 min mistake.


For #20, it did not make sense to go through any route except the route that I used. However, it was very difficult to find the trail junction (circled in B in the left map above). There were many boulders along the trail, and there was a river in parallel with the trail. However, how do I know where the trail could be found? it took me a while and some luck to find it. I even wondered if the end of the trail should touch another trail when drawing this map, since I could not see a clear trail among the boulders. However, once the trail head was found, the rest was not so difficult. I probably had spent 10 min to find this trail head.

The rest of the legs were fine. I was just tired. The result was something that I was not proud of. I felt that it was possible for me to finish this course within 2 hours.

Post-race

When I got back to the result processing station with some personal disappointment, I found that my backpack was not there. We were later told that the driver who took care of the baggage transportation did not drive the bags to the result processing station, so there were some delays in getting a backup plan to return the bags to us. We were then told that some bags were already delivered to a road downhill from the result processing station. I wished I could leave ASAP, so I went down and claimed the bag. Without the bag, I did not have my phone to contact anyone. I also could not see the real-time results. So far, I still did not know how bad I did compare to the others.

When I got to the bus station, I met KK Yeung, a very experienced orienteer. He told me that the courses were overall quite fun, but he also noticed the opposite traffic flows for different courses, which should be avoided. In the FB group, some said that the winning time was too long.

Back home, I found from the FB group that someone was missing in the course area. This was later in news on the next day. Missing a person in an orienteering event is rare. In fact, it was the first time for me to hear such thing happen. When a person did not report at the finish before the event end time, the organizer would form a team to search for missing people, and seek assistance from the civil service groups from the government. Fortunately, the missing person was found at 1:30 am without injury.

Will this happen to be someday? I hope not, and I should not worry too much, since this was the first time that I heard missing in the woods happened in an orienteering event.

To summarize the performance of the organizer:

Things that do well

- the truly "refreshment stations" that offer different drinks
- the course is quite fun
- the efforts in dealing with unexpected events, including baggage lost in transportation and missing of a participant.

Things that can improve

- try to have just one event center, so that a family can come together.
- the course flow design and the winning time management

Thank you for organizing this long orienteering event!

(P.S. In the future, I do think about getting a sport camera. Hopefully, I could take the video when running the course, especially for sprints)